IPB Executive Director Sean Conner’s Common Security Speech

IPB Executive Director Sean Conner’s Common Security Speech in the International Trade Union’s July 28 webinar For Democracy that Delivers Peace and Prosperity for All.

The basic idea behind Common Security is that the security of one is inextricably linked to the security of all; that the security of a state, nation, or peoples cannot be achieved at the expense of the security of another; that security is not a zero-sum game. 

Continue reading “IPB Executive Director Sean Conner’s Common Security Speech”

Unyielding Grace: Shirine Jurdi and the Feminine Force for Justice

This episode brings you a powerful and unflinching conversation with Shirine Jurdi, a global advocate for women, peace, and security from Lebanon. Prepare to challenge your perspectives as Shirine dismantles the narratives often imposed on women in conflict zones, offering a raw and honest look at the realities of war, justice, and the fight for a life of dignity, not just survival.

Continue reading “Unyielding Grace: Shirine Jurdi and the Feminine Force for Justice”

A GLOBAL CALL TO ACTION: FOR DEMOCRACY THAT DELIVERS PEACE AND PROSPERITY FOR ALL

FOR DEMOCRACY THAT DELIVERS PEACE AND PROSPERITY FOR ALL

As we approach the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we, the undersigned organisations, call on governments and international institutions to reaffirm their commitment to a world free from nuclear weapons, honouring the demand of the Hibakusha and 2024 Nobel Peace laureate Nihon Hidankyo, and to prioritize sustainable development over militarism, people of collective power, accelerating military build-up and climate change, and diverting resources away from human development and peacebuilding.

As organisations from the peace, labour, economic justice, and climate movements, we share the belief that collective security can only be ensured through solidarity, by meeting the basic needs of all people.

Continue reading “A GLOBAL CALL TO ACTION: FOR DEMOCRACY THAT DELIVERS PEACE AND PROSPERITY FOR ALL”

IPB Press Release: For Democracy that Delivers Peace and Prosperity for All

27 July 2025, Berlin, Germany

 The International Peace Bureau (IPB), in cooperation with the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), Greenpeace, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, Oxfam, and 350.org, has released a global call to action for nuclear and conventional disarmament, common security, and a prioritization of sustainable development over militarism.

Continue reading “IPB Press Release: For Democracy that Delivers Peace and Prosperity for All”

IPB Statement on Thailand-Cambodia Border Clashes

25 July 2025

The International Peace Bureau (IPB) expresses deep concern over the rising military clashes and political tensions between Thailand and Cambodia, which have resulted in the death of at least 15 civilians and the mass displacement of civilians from border areas. The escalation of long-standing tensions over the border risks further exacerbating civilian suffering and displacement.

The IPB calls for an immediate ceasefire and a return to diplomatic negotiations and conflict resolution as the only tools that can solve the crisis. Nationalist and militaristic rhetoric must be replaced by dialogue and common security. Moreover, IPB calls on ASEAN, particularly neighbour states, in the region and those with military ties to either party to encourage de-escalation and peaceful resolution.

Click on the button to load the content from docs.google.com.

Load content

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Neutrality Colloquium: A Call to Action for Active Neutrality & World Peace

Neutrality Colloquium: A Call to Action for Active Neutrality & World Peace

Geneva, Switzerland | June 26-27, 2025

The Neutrality Colloquium took place on June 26–27, 2025, in Geneva, Switzerland, bringing together 90 experts in diplomacy, international law, peacebuilding, and digitalization, from 27 countries across five continents—including Colombia, Argentina, Costa Rica, the USA, the DRC, Syria, Moldova, Ireland, Japan, and China. Held in hybrid format, the Colloquium served as a critical platform to explore and promote active neutrality as a strategy for peacebuilding, conflict prevention, and global stability amid growing geopolitical tensions, rising militarization, and ongoing humanitarian crises.

This gathering followed the First International Congress on Neutrality, which was held in Bogotá, Colombia, in April 2024. That congress marked a milestone, with participants from 25 countries laying the groundwork for a renewed global conversation on neutrality. The Geneva Colloquium was conceived as a smaller, expert-level forum to build upon that momentum and shape the vision for the Second International Congress on Neutrality, scheduled for 2026.

The event was jointly organized by a coalition of organizations committed to peace and disarmament: Global Veterans Peace Network (GVPN), World BEYOND War, Inter-University Network for Peace (REDIPAZ), International Peace Bureau (IPB), Transnational Institute, the Colombia Peace Agreement, and the Geneva Center for Neutrality, which hosted the gathering. Their collaboration was essential to the success of the Colloquium.

Over two days, participants engaged in five thematic focus groups:

  • Current Neutrality Practices
  • Digital Neutrality in the Age of Cyberwarfare and AI
  • Neutrality and Media
  • Building a New Non-Aligned Movement
  • Neutrality and Common Security in a Militarized World

Each group developed specific recommendations, which were integrated into the final outcomes of the Colloquium: a Modern Neutrality Final Declaration and an Action Agenda to Promote Active Neutrality.

The Declaration stresses that neutrality is not indifference. Rather, it is a strategic, principled approach to international relations—one that prioritizes peace over power projection, sovereignty over dominance, and cooperation over confrontation. In light of the alarming rise in military expenditures—including NATO’s recent commitment to allocate up to 5% of GDP to defense—the declaration calls for redirecting resources from warfare to social, ecological, and economic justice.

“Active neutrality is neither passive nor indifferent. It is a proactive, values-based stance, rooted in non-alignment, non-intervention, and demilitarization. In a context of rising geopolitical rivalries, climate breakdown, and digital warfare, active neutrality means to:

  • Prioritize peace over power projection
  • Promote sovereignty and self-determination, especially for the Global South
  • Reject participation in arms races, military alliances or military interventions
  • Promote dialogue, diplomacy and multilateralism
  • Invest in social, ecological and economic justice instead of war”

The Geneva Colloquium marked a significant step in global efforts to redefine and reinvigorate the role of neutrality in the 21st century. The inputs and outcomes of this event will directly inform the Second International Congress on Neutrality in 2026—ensuring that the principles of active neutrality continue to evolve as powerful tools for peace and justice in our increasingly polarized world.

You can read and download the documents below:
  1. Modern Neutrality Final Declaration
  2. Action Agenda to Promote Active Neutrality
  3. Press Release: Colloquium on Neutrality by Geneva Center for Neutrality Official
  • Modern Neutrality Final Declaration

  • Action Agenda to Promote Active Neutrality

  • Press Release: Colloquium on Neutrality by Geneva Center for Neutrality
Other Articles:

Statement:  Call for De-escalation in the India-Pakistan Military Standoff

9 May 2025

The International Peace Bureau (IPB) condemns the heinous attack in Pahalgam -Kashmir on 22 April, where 26 civilians lost their lives, as well as the retaliatory attacks which have killed civilians on both sides of the line of control and in Pakistan’s sovereign territory. IPB condoles with the victims’ families and friends. Terrorism of any kind from any source is unacceptable to civilized society and the international community condemns such acts.

IPB understands that at times of national grief there is a call for retribution. However, we believe that military standoffs escalate an already tense situation and can spiral into full scale wars with disastrous consequences for countries and peoples. These military conflicts destabilize entire regions, disturb the economy, and immiserate people. Once initiated armed conflicts can go on for a long time. Any confrontation between two nuclear-armed powers like India and Pakistan is a threat to the world – as outlined in publications like the 2019 Bulletin of Atomic Scientists’ How an India-Pakistan nuclear war could start – and have global consequences – and both these countries must heed the calls of the international community and cease military confrontations that can lead to a nuclear exchange.

The IPB appeals to both the governments of India and Pakistan to immediately halt all military confrontations, cease the spiral of retributions and return to calm. All indirectly involved states – including the United States, Russia, and China – must likewise call for de-escalation and diplomacy and reject provoking the conflict for their own interests where all are major arms suppliers. There is no substitute for bilateral and regional diplomacy, dialogue, and engagement. World history has repeatedly shown that common security is the most rational and sustainable way to both peace and development.

The IPB hopes that both the Governments of India and Pakistan resort to reason and de-escalate these tensions with immediacy.

SOME WAY OUT OF HERE:Disarming Nuclear Powers & Preventing Proliferation

Report from Campaign for Peace Disarmament and Common Security shared via Newsletter | 07 May 2025

We were privileged to play the leading role in organizing “SOME WAY OUT OF HERE: Disarming Nuclear Powers & Preventing Proliferation” side event at the United Nations during the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty PrepCom. The session featured Yayoi Tsuchda, the Assistant General Secretary of Gensuiko, the Japan Council against A- & H- Bombs, Dr. Marco Marzo, Secretary General of the Brazilian-Argentine Agency for Accounting and Control of Nuclear Weapons; and John Burroughs the senior analyst and former Executive Director of the Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy.

Continue reading “SOME WAY OUT OF HERE:Disarming Nuclear Powers & Preventing Proliferation”

The world spent 2.71 trillion $ in the military in 2024, according to new data published today by SIPRI

  • Global military spending reached $2.7 billions, representing a 9.4% increase in 2024 compared to the previous year, according to SIPRI estimates—marking the largest rise in recent history, with a nearly 20% increase in just three years.
  • Over 100 peace organizations of 30 different countries call on governments to reduce military spending and instead address through cooperation and diplomacy the global challenges of our time.

Military approaches are gaining ground in the Middle East, with a 15% increase in military spending; in Europe, with an overall rise of 17%, led by Western Europe, which has increased its military budget by 24%; and in East and Southeast Asia, with increases of 7.5% and 7.8% respectively. NATO countries continue to lead globally, with their 32 members accounting for 55% of total global military spending—amounting to $1.506 trillion.
US military spending grew 5.7% to $997 billion, accounting for 37% of the global total by 2024. Russia, which increased its military spending by 38% in just one year ($149 billion), and Israel, with a 65% rise, are clearly committing to a war economy that supports political projects based on the use of military force.
China has increased its military budget for the thirty-third consecutive year, once again ranking as the second-largest military spender with $314 billion in 2024.

These are some of the key conclusions that can be drawn from the new global military spending data released today by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). The Global Days of Action on Military Spending (GDAMS), together with Centre Delàs of Peace Studies, analyzes the new military spending data and call for a reduction in global military expenditures, as well as for real efforts toward a new security architecture based on common security, disarmament, and international cooperation.

“The commitment to militarization by the major powers, along with international political uncertainty, distances the chances for peace in some of the main armed conflicts and increases the likelihood of opting for military solutions in regions with latent tensions. Furthermore, the arbitrary target of 2% of global GDP for military budgets is now being replaced by 3.5% or even 5%. This is boosting the business prospects of arms companies, and we know three out of four of the leading military industries are based in NATO countries,” analyzes Jordi Calvo, coordinator of Centre Delàs and the Global Campaign on Military Spending (GCOMS).

Military spending drives a militaristic Europe and moves peace further away from the continent.

EU member aggregate military spending reached 370 billion in 2024, the second highest after the US, and reaching a level in 2024 higher than the recorded at the end of the Cold War, with a 17% increase, primarily driven by Central and Eastern European countries. However, four of the five European countries that rank among the top 15 highest spenders are still Western; Germany, in particular, increased its military spending by 28% in 2024, becoming the largest investor in Central and Western Europe for the first time since reunification.

This goes hand in hand with the widespread discourse of European militarism in which the European Union itself is not left behind. In addition to the EU’s direct subsidies for the research, development, production, and acquisition of armaments, which would amount to nearly €1.5 billion in 2024 and €5 billion under the European Peace Facility, the European Commission has facilitated the use of civil programs for military projects, from the environmental LIFE program to transportation and regional funds, while encouraging private financial actors, including those involved in sustainable finance and the European Investment Bank, to invest in arms companies.

“Between the exacerbation of the global arms race and the defense of a contested hegemony, the militarization of the EU also poses a threat to the peace and security of its citizens. The recent plan for an additional €800 billion in military spending over the next four years will, sooner or later, lead to a reduction in public spending on healthcare, pensions, education, or the fight against climate change and its consequences,” warns Laëtitia Sedou, European advocacy coordinator for ENAAT, the European campaign against the arms trade

As military spending and defense initiatives grow, resources that could otherwise address pressing social challenges—such as climate change, public health, and poverty—are diverted towards furthering military capabilities. This shift toward militarization risks exacerbating tensions both within Europe and beyond, fueling instability and undermining efforts toward peaceful conflict resolution and cooperative international relations.

The 2025 GDAMS Appeal calls for an end to this arms race through drastic reductions of military spending.

Our campaign launched an Appeal at the beginning of this GDAMS period which has so far garnered more than 100 endorsements from organizations from 30 different countries all across the world (see the list here).  Together, we call on governments to reduce military spending and instead address through cooperation and diplomacy the global challenges of our time, which require all available resources. The Appeal also calls for efforts aimed at global disarmament, stopping the arms trade and ceasing arms shipments to countries in conflict, demanding governments that they use all existing means to push for a real ceasefire and an end to the genocide in Gaza.

Join us on April 28 for our biggest day of action!
For the occasion we’ve prepared this toolkit with infographics, a press release, materials, and post suggestions in this shared folder.

Earth Day Statement: Defending Earth means demilitarizing

By Pere Brunet, researcher and activist at Centre Delàs and GCOMS.
Originally posted on the GCOMS website here.
Spanish version of this article was published in El Salto.

In front of global warming, resource depredation and the climate crisis, we face an ethical dilemma. If we are aware that the Earth hosts us during our short life and that we have the obligation to respect it, perhaps we could reverse the current ecocidal practices and move toward more democratic and collaborative societies. Otherwise, we know that the short-sighted and militarized business can end up threatening our survival as a species, or at least that of millions of people worldwide.

It’s actually curious. We search for life on other planets while disregarding life on Earth, ignoring human dignity, harming the biosphere, and treating natural resources as if they were limitless.

Defending Earth requires demilitarizing. Because the emissions from the military sector contribute directly to global warming. Because the military security systems guarantee the extraction and supply of oil, gas and natural resources that also worsen the climate crisis. Because we need the funds from military budgets to face the very serious climate crisis that is upon us. Because addressing this crisis should be the top priority of all world governments, along with social spending and far ahead of all kinds of armed disputes and conflicts over power and territory.

The warnings go back a long way. In addition to proclaiming that we should move from weaponry to livingry that takes care of people, Buckminster Fuller published in 1969 a text titled “Operating manual for spaceship Earth”. In it he explained that Earth resembles a spaceship: from outer space it appears as a point of blue light traveling through the darkness of the Universe. And comparing humanity with astronauts, he observed that these should follow three rules: take care of the ship, manage their limited fuel very well and be well matched. Because messing up the ship or getting into a fight can be fatal. His conclusion was that we should know how to manage the limited resources of the planet, seeing that our only salvation as humanity is to cooperate, respecting the planet and leaving behind violence and war.

Indeed, we’re not celebrating Earth Day when we intend to rearm and increase our military budget. To actually celebrate Earth Day would mean:

  1. Being aware of the incredible human and environmental damage that global power networks cause through their predatory, neo-colonial, neocapitalist and militarized practices.
  2. Demilitarizing our minds. Listening to the voices that the official narratives seek to silence, questioning the biased messages we receive, and verifying their truthfulness and authorship.
  3. Detecting which are the real causes of the current problems our planet is suffering from, becoming indignant and denouncing their practices.
  4. Actively working to stop the capitalist excess and come back to the circle of the ecological and natural balance that we should have never exceeded. Learning to downsize in order to live better. Reducing emissions, consumption and weaponry.
  5. Taking care of the planet that hosts us, proclaiming that the actual neo-colonial practices and policies are unsustainable and criminal for the present and future peoples. Demanding a transition to respectful and post-colonial methods.
  6. Demanding urgent and effective policies to decarbonize and leave behind the oil civilization. Supporting a local, community-based, and respectful energy transition. Demanding the control and transparency of the emissions of the entire military system, which far from contributing to the solution, is a central part of the problem and of the environmental crisis.
  7. Proclaiming that it is essential to reduce military budgets. Demilitarizing and disarming. Going from weaponry to livingry. Participating in campaigns like GCOMS, making ourselves heard during the GDAMS days, remembering the warnings that science has made and continues to make with the clear message that we should take back the funds that are currently being allocated to defence, because the Earth needs the money that is being spent on the military.
  8. Listening and heeding the silenced voices that are also coming from feminism, marginalized people and indigenous communities. Wise voices that understand us as part of nature and its harmony, never superior to it. 
  9. Fighting to break the global networks of power that are based on violence and consumption, oligarchies and centers for the dissemination of racist, patriarchal, supremacist and bellicist messages. Using consumption and objection as empowering tools of peoples against the business that feeds on what we buy from them.
  10. Defending that we have to build new geopolitics, based on respect to the limits of the planet and the dignity and rights of people. A people-centered geopolitics: of the people and for the people. A human geopolitics that is based on the resolution of conflicts through negotiation and dialogue. 
  11. Proclaiming and pursuing injustices, crimes against humanity and all the ecocidal and genocidal actions against humanity, the biosphere and the Earth. Defending the imperative need to reduce global military spending in order to take care of the Earth and the life that it hosts. Denouncing those responsible so that fear and shame may, once and for all, change sides.