Author: sean

NATO in crisis: time to overcome the war machine

NATO Peace Counter Summits – Online

As NATO faces its deepest ever crisis, this counter-summit will focus on the impact of the dramatically changing global situation, and the opportunities this presents for change. The decades-long ideological and political relationship between Europe and the USA is changing beyond all recognition. The US pursues brutal unilateral dominance with vassal status for Europe. Europe pursues greater independence based on insane levels of militarism to the point of risking a nuclear war. The situation is unsustainable and dangerous in the extreme

This new situation presents the peace movement with new challenges and new opportunities. Can NATO be dealt a death blow? What will come in its place? Can we overcome the warmongering ideology that is increasingly dominating our societies? How can we build an alternative security framework that meets people’s needs and guarantees real security for all?

This ‘No to War – No to NATO network’ counter-summit will explore these questions, develop an analysis of NATO in the rapidly changing situation, and look at the implications for our movements. Please join us.

Continue reading “NATO in crisis: time to overcome the war machine”

From Helsingborg to Ankara: Global Voices on NATO, Militarization, and Welfare

Overview

This online gathering takes place alongside the NATO Foreign Ministerial Meeting in Helsingborg, Sweden (May 21–22), which is expected to emphasize increased defence spending. Such commitments risk undermining efforts toward peace, social justice, and effective responses to the climate and environmental crisis. There is an urgent need to critically examine NATO’s expanding role, as it increasingly extends its influence beyond the military into areas such as natural resources, technology, finance, and media. This raises concerns about global power imbalances, growing militarization, and the diversion of resources from urgent social and environmental needs. The gathering will bring together diverse perspectives, creating space for critical discussion and constructive alternatives, while fostering intergenerational dialogue and amplifying younger voices.

Continue reading “From Helsingborg to Ankara: Global Voices on NATO, Militarization, and Welfare”

NATO and the Current Conjuncture

Anuradha Chenoy | May 21, 2026

  1. The US seeks to retain global primacy, but its strategic weaknesses are evident in 3 events: (i) Iran’s ability to retain its state structure and leadership; leverage oil and the Straits of Hormuz despite US-Israeli aggression and attempts for de-stabilization. Resistance groups in Palestine, Lebanon, Yemen remain. (ii) US inability to sustain funding and arms support to the Russia-Ukraine war (iii) China’s rise as ‘near peer’. The Trump-Xi meeting (May 15-16, 2026) established the two as equal powers- something the US has not experienced for decades since unipolar hegemony. Trump calls this ‘G2’, Rubio acknowledges this as “strategic stability point”. Chinese see this as a period of ‘strategic stalemate’. So, the Indo-Pacific (Asia Pacific) will remain a theatre of intense but ‘managed’ competition. This is a paradigm shift in international politics. The US seeks domination as usual while China seeks parity. This competition has global impacts.
Continue reading “NATO and the Current Conjuncture”

América Latina: No a la Guerra, No a la OTAN

Pablo Ruiz E.*
Spanish | English. Please see the English translation below.

Desde América del Sur observamos con mucha preocupación la política, maniobras y ejercicios militares que realizan los países miembros de la OTAN en el mundo y que pueden desencadenar una tercera guerra mundial que tendría consecuencias devastadora para todos los países, incluida América Latina, ya que una tercera guerra mundial contra Rusia o China, eventualmente, podría involucrar armas nucleares.

De acuerdo al Centro Estratégico Latinoamericano de Geopolítica (CELAG):

  • Colombia: Es socio global de la OTAN desde 2018, lo que implica una cooperación estrecha en seguridad, aunque no es miembro pleno.
  • Perú: Designado en 2026 como aliado principal no miembro de la OTAN por EEUU, facilitando cooperación en defensa y tecnología. Además, cuenta con certificación Nivel 2 en catalogación OTAN.
  • Argentina: Mantiene el estatus de aliado importante extra-OTAN desde 1998, fortaleciendo sus lazos.
  • Chile: Vinculado desde 2004 al Sistema OTAN de Catalogación (SOC), avanzando en modernización logística con software de la alianza.
  • Brasil: Usuario del sistema de catalogación de la OTAN y reconocido aliado importante de la OTAN.
Continue reading “América Latina: No a la Guerra, No a la OTAN”

Welfare not Warfare: Europe-wide mobilisation on 14 June against EU and NATO rearmament plans

More than 800 civil-society organisations, trade unions and movements call for demonstrations in Brussels and across the continent — just days before EU heads of state negotiate the bloc’s next long-term budget.

BRUSSELS, 9 June 2026 — On Sunday 14 June, Stop ReArm Europe, a Europe-wide coalition of more than 800 civil-society organisations, trade unions and social movements, in collaboration with the Belgian platform Stop Militarisation, will take to the streets of Brussels and dozens of other cities across Europe to oppose the European Union’s and NATO’s drive to rearm. Their main demand: public money must be spent on welfare, not warfare.

The mobilisation comes just days before EU leaders meet on 18–19 June for a European Council that will negotiate the Union’s next seven-year budget — the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028–2034 — which the coalition warns is being reshaped to channel tens of billions of euros to the arms industry.

In Brussels, demonstrators will gather at 3pm at Brussels-North station under the banner Welfare not Warfare, before marching towards the institutions driving the rearmament agenda. They will reconvene from 6pm in an open assembly at the Royal Library of Belgium (Keizerslaan 4/Boulevard de l’Empereur 4, Brussels) near Central-Station to plan the next steps of a continent-wide campaign.

Organisers emphasise that 14 June is not an endpoint, but a common focal point, with demonstrations, public meetings and coordinated actions planned throughout the month in Belgium, the Netherlands, Austria, Spain, Finland, Germany, Italy and other countries.

A budget reshaped for war

The coalition opposes the EU’s ReArm Europe plan, announced in March 2025, which set out to mobilise €800 billion for arms — money drawn away from healthcare, education, climate action and social protection.The coalition rejects the idea that Europe’s security can be bought through a massive rearmament project that starves social budgets and escalates confrontation. The security concerns repeatedly highlighted by the EU, cannot in any case be resolved by rearmament.

The Commission’s proposed next budget goes further still: it would allocate around €131 billion to the defence, security and space window of the new European Competitiveness Fund — five times the amount designated in the current budget. The jump to €131 billion is a net increase of at least €100 billion over seven years on the current defence and space envelope. That sum could instead fund the salaries of around 300,000 nurses, or build roughly half a million social homes — a quarter of the 2.25 million-unit housing shortfall the European Investment Bank identified for 2025 alone.

The reach extends beyond that headline figure: civilian programmes for research, mobility and cohesion would also be opened to military use. With the overall EU budget barely growing, the coalition warns, this amounts to a direct transfer from civilian to military spending. Campaigners warn that Europe is embarking on a permanent war economy that deepens conflicts rather than resolving them, will further fuel a global arms race, and increasingly embed militarisation into everyday life — from renewed conscription and expanded reserves to surveillance and the shrinking of democratic space.

They also point to the growing influence of the arms lobby: by the coalition’s count, the European Commission met arms-industry representatives 89 times on rearmament in 2025 (to October), against only 15 meetings with NGOs, trade unions or scientists on the same topics.

Borrowing for arms is also a poor economic decision. Military spending is capital- and import-heavy, so it creates fewer jobs per euro than almost any civilian alternative: studies of military versus civilian spending consistently find that money invested in care, education or housing generates 30–50% more jobs than the same sum spent on weapons. And borrowing to buy arms locks future generations into debt with no productive asset to show for it.

What the coalition is demanding

Stop ReArm Europe is calling on EU and national decision-makers to:

  • invest in healthcare, education, decent work, housing and a just climate transition — not in the militarisation of society;
  • uphold international law and the UN Charter, and defend human and labour rights;
  • prioritise dialogue and diplomacy over confrontation;
  • invest in international solidarity and cooperation as the surest foundation for stable, secure societies; and
  • pursue arms control and nuclear disarmament in order to guarantee peace and human security.

Furthermore, the coalition is urging MEPs to refuse consent to any long-term EU budget that channels €131 billion into defence, security and space while squeezing social and cohesion funding.

“Rearmament is sold to us as security, but the only thing it really secures are the profits of the weapon industries. A society with crumbling hospitals and a destabilised climate is not secure. Spending billions on arms while squeezing care, education and cohesion makes Europe poorer and more dangerous, not safer. On 14 June we are demanding a different set of priorities.” – Katerina Anastasiou, spokesperson for Stop ReArm Europe

The coalition is inviting movements, organisations and elected representatives at European and national level to join the Brussels demonstration and organise actions in their own communities. Local initiatives can be registered on the Stop ReArm Europe campaign’s action calendar, as part of a growing popular mobilisation demanding welfare, not warfare.

Notes to editors

  • Stop ReArm Europe is a pan-European coalition of more than 800 civil-society organisations and movements, spanning peace, climate, debt, trade-union, development, health and human-rights sectors, campaigning to redirect resources “from war to peace” and towards human and common security.
  • Brussels demonstration: Sunday 14 June, 15:00, departing Brussels-North station.
  • Across Europe: decentralised demonstrations and actions are planned through June. A full calendar is available at https://calendar.stoprearm.org/events/
  • The Belgian national mobilisation is organised by the Stop Militarisation Platform under the banner “For social justice, against war” (Pour la justice sociale, contre la guerre), backed by some 40 Belgian organisations including the FGTB/ABVV and CSC/ACV trade unions, CNCD-11.11.11, Greenpeace, DiEM25, Oxfam, Pax Christi, Vrede vzw, CNAPD and Vredesactie.
  • The European Council of 18–19 June will discuss the next Multiannual Financial Framework on the basis of a “negotiation box” prepared by the Cypriot presidency. The Commission’s proposal allocates €131 billion to the defence and space window of the European Competitiveness Fund, a fivefold increase on the 2021–2027 figure of roughly €26 billion.

Media contact

International Peace Bureau (IPB)
Email: info@ipb.org
Web: www.ipb.org

Issued by Stop ReArm Europe Coordination on behalf of its member organisations.

Press Release StatementDownload

IPB Situational Brief: The Sudanese Civil War

The Victims, The Perpetrators & The Lifelines

June 2026 | International Peace Bureau

This situational brief examines the ongoing civil war in Sudan, tracing the origins of the conflict, the regional and international actors sustaining it, and its devastating impact on civilians. It highlights the widespread atrocities committed during the war, the catastrophic humanitarian crisis facing the Sudanese population, and the vital role played by Sudan’s Emergency Response Rooms (ERRs) in sustaining communities amid state collapse. The brief also outlines the failures of the international response and presents the International Peace Bureau’s position and calls to action for governments, institutions, and civil society.

IPB POSITION & CALL TO ACTION

The International Peace Bureau (IPB) recognizes the Sudan Emergency Response Rooms as among the most extraordinary examples of civilian-led humanitarian action in recent history. In a context of state collapse, genocidal violence, and international neglect, ERR volunteers have sustained millions of lives at extraordinary personal risk.

Continue reading “IPB Situational Brief: The Sudanese Civil War”

Welfare not Warfare | Rally In Brussels on 14 June & Month Of Decentralized Action Across Europe!

Organized and coordinated by the Stop Militarization Platform and StopRearmEurope campaign, of which IPB is a member.
If you haven’t already, sign our call to action here and join the European movement against ReArm Europe!

Continue reading “Welfare not Warfare | Rally In Brussels on 14 June & Month Of Decentralized Action Across Europe!”

Indigenous Leaders Call for Global Recognition of Peacebuilding Role as UN Forum Echoes Summit Outcomes

NEW YORK, May 6, 2026 — Indigenous leaders, diplomats and United Nations officials convened in New York for the Second Global Summit on Indigenous Peacebuilding, issuing a call to reframe global peace and security efforts by placing Indigenous Peoples at the center of conflict prevention and resolution.

Held in New York City on April 25–26, 2026, the two-day summit gathered 300 representatives from 80 countries and seven socio-cultural regions of the world amid growing concern that a majority of the world’s conflicts occur in biodiversity-rich areas inhabited by Indigenous Peoples.

Organizers said the summit has already influenced international policy discussions. The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues referenced the event and its recommendations in its 2026 outcome document, including a proposal to declare 2027–2037 an International Decade of Indigenous Peacebuilding.

Opening the Summit, Binalakshmi Nepram, Founder-Director of Manipur Women Gun Survivors Network and President of the Global Alliance of Indigenous Peoples, Gender Justice and Peace, called for a fundamental shift: “It is time to move from seeing Indigenous Peoples as victims of conflict to recognizing them as experts, mediators, and negotiators of peace.”  The Summit built on the outcomes of the first global gathering, which led to the first-ever declaration on Indigenous Peacebuilding and the creation of a Global Network of Indigenous Peacebuilders, Mediators and Negotiators to help resolve some of the world’s most entrenched conflicts.

A series of global initiatives were launched at the gathering, including the Global Indigenous Mothers March for Peace, Healing and Unity, the recognition of an innovative and much-needed Indigenous Humanitarian Peacebuilding (IHP) Model to respond directly to survivors in war and conflict zones,  a forthcoming book on Indigenous Peacebuilding, and the rollout of online and in-person curriculum programs to train Indigenous peacebuilders worldwide.

A central feature of the summit was the Weaving for Peace exhibition, which brought together traditional textiles from Indigenous communities across Manipur, Guatemala, Papua New Guinea, Bolivia, the Haudenosaunee, the Sámi region, Maasai Regions, Amazon and the Sahel, highlighting cultural resilience as a foundation for peace.

Speakers pointed to rising global displacement—estimated at around 200 million people—with many conflicts linked to resource extraction, environmental degradation and transnational organized crime affecting Indigenous territories with huge humanitarian consequence.  Aluki Kotierk, Chair of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, underscored the role of Indigenous knowledge systems rooted in balance and reciprocity. “Indigenous Peoples must be recognized not as security threats, but as part of the security infrastructure,” said Dr Albert Barume, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Indigenous Issues, framing Indigenous peacebuilding as a matter of international peace and security.

Justin Mohammad, Ambassador for First Nations People, Australia, said Indigenous diplomacy has long shaped relations across regions and should be integrated into modern peace processes.

“When multilateral institutions are being questioned, we need governance—but we must humanize it,” said Laura Gil, Assistant Secretary General of the Organization of American States. Omar Hilale, Permanent Representative of Morocco to the United Nations and Chair of the United Nations Peacebuilding Commission, emphasized the need for inclusive peacebuilding approaches that incorporate Indigenous knowledge and local leadership.

Laura Flores Director of Americas Division of the United Nations Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs also joined and stated, “member states are increasingly recognizing Indigenous Peoples’ role in peacebuilding, including through a landmark resolution on Indigenous Peoples’ rights and their role in peacebuilding, negotiations, and transitional justice.”

Ana Pérez Conguache, representing the Guatemala Presidential Commission, highlighted the importance of addressing land rights, inequality and historical injustices as part of sustainable peace.

Ambassador David Lametti, Permanent Representative of Canada to the United Nations also spoke at the Summit pledging support for Indigenous Peacebuilding.

Many scholars and leaders from conflict affected regions such as Dr Noni Arambam, Maisnam Arnapal, Adam Kuleit Ole Mwarabu, Daniel Mastaki from DRC, Nuba Mountain and many others also spoke.

Participants concluded with a shared message: that the world’s Indigenous Peoples are the world’s peacemakers; that wars and conflicts currently engineered in Indigenous territories must end immediately; and that Indigenous Peoples who are displaced must be protected.

That justice, inclusion, and the leadership of Indigenous Peoples—their peacemaking and their wisdom—hold the key for healing people, for peace and the planet, and it’s time UN member states and the world realize and ensure this in policy, planning, action, and resourcing. Photos from the Summit are attached.

Contact: Media/Global Network of Indigenous Peacebuilders, Mediators and Negotiators/ Alliance of Indigenous Peoples, Gender Justice and Peace

Email:  newyorksummit@indigenouspeacebuildersnetwork.org
https://www.indigenouspeacebuildersnetwork.org

90+ Organizations Call for a Ban on the EU-Israel Association Agreement

April 16th 2026


Dear President von der Leyen,
Dear High Representative / Vice-President Kallas,
Dear Foreign Ministers of the EU member states,


We, the undersigned humanitarian and human rights organisations and trade unions, write to you as Israeli authorities escalate their brutal repression and illegal annexation policies in Palestine, and violations of international humanitarian law (IHL) in Palestine and Lebanon to urge you to adopt the long-overdue measures proposed by President von der Leyen in September 2025, in particular the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, along with any additional steps necessary to comply with international law, including banning trade with illegal Israeli settlements and suspending all transfers and transit of arms to Israel.


Already in June 2025, the EU had found Israel in breach of Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, which identifies respect of human rights and democratic principles as “essential elements” of the treaty. Ongoing actions by Israeli authorities in Israel, throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) and in Lebanon further compound that breach, and are causing immense suffering to millions throughout the region.


Last month, the Israeli Knesset passed a discriminatory death penalty law that significantly expands the scope and application of the death penalty, in effect targeting Palestinians only. The law is not only an egregious violation of the rights to life and fair trial of Palestinians, but also adds to the growing body of discriminatory legislation and policies implemented by Israeli authorities against Palestinians, which the International Court of Justice has found to violate Article 3 CERD, which prohibits racial segregation and apartheid, in its Advisory Opinion of July 2024. Numerous UN bodies and experts, Palestinian, Israeli and international human rights organisations, and renowned legal scholars, have also documented how these policies and legislation amount to the system and crime against humanity of apartheid.


In the occupied West Bank, Israel is accelerating its illegal annexation policies and practices and is intensifying repression and serious abuses against Palestinians. Since the start of the war with Iran and Lebanon, the situation has severely worsened. Since 28 February, Israeli authorities have imposed strict movement restrictions across the OPT. In addition to previously existing check-points, dozens of new road gates have been installed by Israeli authorities in the West Bank since October 2023, most of which are now closed, severely impacting Palestinians’ access to their lands, workplaces, schools, health and emergency services. Moreover, Israeli forces and state-backed settlers have increased attacks against Palestinians, with over 200 attacks in March alone, including reports of sexual abuse. According to UN OCHA this year Israeli forces and settlers have killed 34 Palestinians, including seven children and injured 771, including 97 children. Attacks are increasingly directed towards larger Palestinian villages in area B, spreading through the West Bank. Since October 2023, state-backed settler violence has led to the displacement of 38 entire Palestinian communities. Less than three months into 2026, 1700 Palestinians have been displaced, already surpassing the total for the whole of 2025. For violent settlers, impunity remains the norm: according to Israeli NGOs, only 3% of cases lead to a full or partial conviction. In contrast, for Palestinians the conviction rate in military courts is 99%.


The increasingly lethal state-backed settler violence goes hand in hand with the acceleration of illegal settlement expansion and annexation policies through a set of measures recently adopted by Israel to displace and dispossess Palestinians in the West Bank. In August 2025, the Israeli Higher Planning Council approved the E1 plan, meant to cut through the occupied Palestinian land, with Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for atrocity crimes, saying out loud that the E1’s goal is to ensure “that there will be no Palestinian state”. In illegally annexed East Jerusalem, Israeli authorities forcibly evicted 15 Palestinian families, including 29 children, from their homes in Batn al-Hawa in Silwan last month. At least 200 other families in the neighbourhood face the risk of forced eviction to enable the unlawful takeover of their homes by settler organisations.


Meanwhile, more than 9560 Palestinians are held in Israeli detention, half of whom are held without charges or trial, either under administrative detention or under the Unlawful Combatants’ Law. Israel currently detains 351 Palestinian children, with more than half held in administrative detention without charge or trial. UN experts, Palestinian and Israeli NGOs have documented systematic torture and inhuman and degrading treatment against Palestinian prisoners, and Israeli authorities continue to deny the ICRC access to all places of detention.


In the occupied Gaza Strip, the Israel-made humanitarian catastrophe persists. Israel remains in breach of three binding orders of the International Court of Justice in the case brought by South Africa for alleged violation of the UN Genocide Convention, including to ensure unimpeded access for humanitarian assistance, and to preserve evidence. The UN Commission of Inquiry, alongside numerous human rights organisations and legal scholars, has found that Israeli authorities have committed and are continuing to commit genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.


Since the start of a so-called ceasefire in October 2025, at least 736 Palestinians have been killed. Airstrikes, shelling and gunfire continues on both sides of the so-called “Yellow Line”, a temporary military demarcation that now risks evolving into an enduring territorial division. In the meantime, newly introduced registration requirements, which violate established humanitarian principles and data protection laws, allowed the Israeli authorities to further restrict the operational space for dozens of international humanitarian organisations.


Israeli policies throughout the OPT run counter the obligations laid out in the July 2024 advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which found Israel’s occupation to be unlawful and marred by serious abuses, including Israel’s breach of Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which prohibits racial segregation and apartheid. The Court clarified Israel should end its occupation, dismantle its settlements, allow Palestinians to return to their homes and provide them with reparations for the harm suffered.


Several experts have warned about the possible “Gazafication” of the conflict in Lebanon, where Israeli forces have displaced over 1.2 million people, around one fifth of the country’s population, in their offensive against Hezbollah, following overly broad evacuation orders which do not constitute effective guarantees of protection. The Israeli military has targeted healthcare facilities and workers, journalists, and civilian infrastructure, including bridges, which will severely impact the ability to deliver food for the people who cannot or choose not to leave their homes, and who should continue to be protected under IHL. Israeli authorities indicated the area would become a “buffer zone” in which all Lebanese homes in border villages will be destroyed and Israel will maintain control over the south of Lebanon up to the Litani river, as stated by Minister Katz.


These developments come on the heels of decades of toothless EU statements of concern and calls for a “two-state solution” that have been largely ignored by Israeli authorities, to no consequences. We welcome commitments by five member states (Spain, Ireland, Slovenia, Belgium, and The Netherlands) to ban imports of goods from illegal Israeli settlements, as required by international law and the ICJ’s advisory opinion of July 2024, and commend Spain for having already banned the imports of goods and advertisements of both goods and services from illegal Israeli settlements as of September 2025. We urge the EU to do the same, in compliance with Articles 3(5) and 21(1) TEU, and in line with its longstanding, unanimous condemnation of Israeli settlement policies as illegal and an “obstacle to a two-state solution” that the EU claims to pursue.


To date, no qualified majority has been reached in the Council to suspend the trade provisions of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, despite repeated calls from member states, Members of the European Parliament, civil society and the European public. This failure to act risks rendering the Association Agreement’s human rights clause meaningless in practice, further tarnishes the EU’s credibility and emboldens the sense of impunity fueling Israel’s growing abuses. We call on member states to support the suspension of the agreement, and urge the Council to reflect on the reputational, legal and most of all human consequences of continued inaction in the face of mounting evidence of crimes under international law committed by Israel both in Palestine and Lebanon.


The European Union and its member states should immediately suspend all transfers and transit of arms, munitions, equipment, technology, parts and dual-use goods to Israel This obligation is not discretionary but arises under both EU and international law. Article 6 and 7 of the Arms Trade Treaty and the EU Common Position on Arms Exports requires states not to transfer arms to a recipient where a clear risk exists they might be used in serious violation of IHL, as is the case for Israel. In addition, Common Article 1 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions requires that States respect and ensure respect for IHL. While several member states have already suspended arms exports, we urge all remaining states to do so without delay. In addition, the EU should take coordinated action at the institutional level to prevent the transit of arms, components, and dual-use goods through its territory to Israel, including by closing existing regulatory and enforcement gaps.


The patterns documented in this letter are the predictable consequence of decades of impunity: a failure by the international community to hold Israeli authorities accountable, and a willingness to allow political considerations to override legal obligations. What remains absent is the political will to act. The measures we urge in this letter, suspending arms transfers, banning trade with illegal Israeli settlements, and suspending the Association Agreement, are not mere political choices. They are legal obligations. The people of Palestine and Lebanon deserve action and accountability, not concerns and condolences. The time to act is long overdue.


Signatories:
International:

ACT Alliance EU
ActionAid International
Amnesty International
Avaaz
Bystanders No More
Caritas Europa
CIDSE- International family of Catholic Social Justice Organisations
Committee to Protect Journalists
Ekō
EuroMed Rights
International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
Global Witness
Human Rights Watch
International Media Support
International Peace Bureau
International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims
Medico International
Oxfam
Pax Christi International
SJES / Society of Jesus
SOLIDAR
United Against Inhumanity
World BEYOND War
World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT)


Member state-based:
11.11.11, Belgium
Act Church of Sweden
Action des Chrétiens pour l’Abolition de la Torture, Luxembourg
ActionAid Denmark
ACV-CSC Belgium
Adala for All, France
Afri (Action from Ireland), Ireland
Ambasada Rog, Slovenia
Association France Palestine Solidarité, France
Avocats Sans Frontières, Belgium
Belgian Academics and Artists for Palestine (BA4P/BACBI), Belgium
Broederlijk Delen, Belgium
Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies
Centre for Global Education, Ireland
Centro Pace ecologia e diritti umani, Italy
CGIL, Italy
Christian Aid Ireland
CISS, Cooperazione Internazionale Sud Sud, Italy
CNCD, Belgium
Comhlámh, Ireland
Comhlámh Justice for Palestine, Ireland
Comité pour une Paix Juste au Proche-Orient, Luxembourg
Committee to Protect Journalists
COPE – Cooperazione Paesi Emergenti, Italy
COSPE, Italy
Danes je nov dan, Inštitut za druga vprašanja, Slovenia
Diakonia, Sweden
Dignity- Danish Institute against Torture, Denmark
docP – BDS Netherlands

EDUCO, Spain
Een Ander Joods Geluid, The Netherlands
Entraide et Fraternité, Belgium
European Coordination of Committees and Associations for Palestine, Belgium
European Trade Union Network for Justice in Palestine, Belgium
FGTB-ABVV, Belgium
Friends of the Earth, Spain
Gaza Group GCDG, Belgium
Glosa, Slovenia
International Committee Against House Demolitions – Germany
Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Ireland
Jewish Call for Peace, Luxembourg
Jews For Palestine Ireland
Junts Associació Catalana de Jueus i Palestins, Spain
Kairos Ireland
Law4Palestine, UK and Sweden
Ligue des droits humains (LDH), France
Nederlands Palestina Komitee, The Netherlands
Olof Palme International Center, Sweden
Palestina Solidariteit vzw, Belgium
PAX, the Netherlands
Peace Institute, Slovenia
Platform of French NGOs for Palestine, France
Portuguese Platform of Development NGOs, Portugal
Pro Peace, Germany
Reka Si, Slovenia
Sadaka-The Ireland Palestine Alliance, Ireland
Slovene Philanthropy, Slovenia
Solsoc, Belgium
Swedish Peace and Arbitration Society, Sweden
SweFOR, Sweden
The Rights Forum, The Netherlands
The Palestine Solidarity Association in Sweden
Trócaire, Ireland
Uniting Church in Sweden
Viva Salud, Belgium
Weltfriedensdienst e.V., Germany
Women for Peace, Finland
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom WILPF Finland
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom WILPF Italy
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom WILPF Spain

    EN-Joint-letter-April-FAC-FIN-1Download