Peace Education

Featured

The International Peace Bureau (IPB) Has Announced its Intention to Nominate Three Remarkable Organizations with a Focus on the Right to Conscientious Objection for the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

3 August 2023

The International Peace Bureau (IPB) Has Announced its Intention to Nominate Three Remarkable Organizations with a Focus on the Right to Conscientious Objection for the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize

Berlin, Germany – The International Peace Bureau (IPB) has announced our intention to nominate three exceptional organizations for the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize: the Russian Movement of Conscientious Objectors, the Ukrainian Pacifist Movement, and the Belarusian organization “Our House”. The decision to nominate these three organizations is a testament to their unwavering dedication in advocating for the right to conscientious objection to military service and promoting human rights and peace in their respective countries.

The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the world’s most esteemed awards, recognizing individuals and organizations that have made significant contributions to the pursuit of peace and harmony. The nomination period for the 2024 prize will open on 1 September 2023 and the nominations will be promptly submitted for consideration.

The Russian Movement of Conscientious Objectors (https://stoparmy.org/), the Ukrainian Pacifist Movement (http://pacifism.org.ua/), and the Belarusian Our House (https://news.house/) have demonstrated unparalleled excellence and dedication in their efforts as defenders of peace, conscientious objection, and human rights, especially after the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine began on 24 February 2022 and despite the considerable stigmatization each organization has faced since.

The fundamental right to conscientious objection to military service is an inherent human right, protected under the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion as safeguarded by Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). This right remains inalienable, even during periods of public emergency, as explicitly stated in Article 4(2) of the ICCPR. Embracing conscientious objection is a concrete means of contributing to peace. Hence, it becomes imperative to emphasize and safeguard this fundamental human right, especially during times of war.

Even in the face of escalating threats, the three movements persist in their dedication to aiding individuals who resist war and military mobilization. Their focus is particularly on supporting those who endure persecution, torture, and imprisonment. This commitment encompasses all instances of forced and violent recruitment into participating armies, as well as the persecution of conscientious objectors, deserters, and non-violent anti-war demonstrators.

“We are humbled and honored to nominate these three remarkable movements for the Nobel Peace Prize. Their courage in championing the right to conscientious objection and their tireless efforts to promote peace and human rights serve as an inspiration to us all,” said Philip Jennings, Co-President of IPB.

By nominating these three movements, we seek to raise awareness about the importance of the right to conscientious objection, fostering peace and human rights. Furthermore, we hope that the announcement of this intended nomination will remind and pressure governments and nations across the globe to respect the right to conscientious objection in their own countries and provide alternatives to military service for those that object. This includes the right to asylum for conscientious objectors forced to flee their own countries in order to avoid military service.

We call other organizations and particularly Nobel Peace Laureates from across the globe to support this nomination. Together our voices in support for conscientious objection can protect those who are selflessly putting their lives on the line to defend their beliefs and their compatriots who reject war and violence.

The selection process for Nobel Peace Prize laureates is highly competitive and is conducted by esteemed committees dedicated to recognizing peace efforts worldwide. We firmly believe that these three movements stand among the most deserving candidates for this prestigious recognition.

About IPB

The International Peace Bureau is dedicated to the vision of a World Without War. Our current main programme centres on Disarmament for Sustainable Development and within this, our focus is mainly on the reallocation of military expenditure.  We are a Nobel Peace Laureate (1910); over the years, 13 of our officers have been recipients of the Nobel Peace Prize.

For media inquiries or further information, please contact:

International Peace Bureau

info@ipb-office.berlin

+49 (0) 30 1208 4549

Marienstraße 19-20 10117, Berlin – Germany

Featured

Justice for Yurii Sheliazhenko

Berlin, Germany – The International Peace Bureau strongly condemns the Security Service of Ukraine’s (SBU) decision to charge IPB Councilmember and Seán MacBride Prize Laureate Yurii Sheliazhenko with “justification of Russian aggression” and search of his apartment. The charge is based solely on Sheliazhenko’s “Peace Agenda for Ukraine and the World,” a document which explicitly condemns the Russian invasion of Ukraine and promotes peace, justice, and the right to conscientious objection to military service.

Yurii and his organization, the Ukrainian Pacifist Movement, have always opposed both sides of the current war and advocated for dialogue, negotiations, and a peaceful resolution which addresses the underlying causes of the war.

We call on the Ukrainian government and the SBU to respect the rights of conscientious objectors and the right to free speech for peace in Ukraine, rights that cannot be violated even during times of war. We vow to support Yurii’s rights and to rally international support for his freedom and wellbeing.

Yurii’s response to the charges and search can be found at https://worldbeyondwar.org/we-object-to-the-illegal-search-and-seizure-at-apartment-of-yurii-sheliazhenko-in-kyiv/

A petition for the Ukrainian government to drop the prosecution of Yurri can be found here: https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/tell-the-ukrainian-government-to-drop-prosecution-of-peace-activist-yurii-sheliazhenko/

Please see attached Press Release.

Featured

Report – 2nd Negotiations Round on a Nulcear Weapons Ban Treaty

After the successful session in March 2017 and the publication of the draft of the Convention to prohibit nuclear weapons by the Chair Ambassador Elayne Whyte from Costa Rica, the Second round of negotiations on a Convention started on June 15th.

The sprit of the 125+ participating countries is productive and dynamic and no major disagreements have been stopping the hard works of the participants from going forward. Nuclear weapons States possessors and their allies, the countries who rely on nuclear weapons in their security doctrines, have chosen to boycott the process, except the Netherlands. Continue reading “Report – 2nd Negotiations Round on a Nulcear Weapons Ban Treaty”

From Helsingborg to Ankara: Global Voices on NATO, Militarization, and Welfare

Overview

This online gathering takes place alongside the NATO Foreign Ministerial Meeting in Helsingborg, Sweden (May 21–22), which is expected to emphasize increased defence spending. Such commitments risk undermining efforts toward peace, social justice, and effective responses to the climate and environmental crisis. There is an urgent need to critically examine NATO’s expanding role, as it increasingly extends its influence beyond the military into areas such as natural resources, technology, finance, and media. This raises concerns about global power imbalances, growing militarization, and the diversion of resources from urgent social and environmental needs. The gathering will bring together diverse perspectives, creating space for critical discussion and constructive alternatives, while fostering intergenerational dialogue and amplifying younger voices.

Continue reading “From Helsingborg to Ankara: Global Voices on NATO, Militarization, and Welfare”

NATO and the Current Conjuncture

Anuradha Chenoy | May 21, 2026

  1. The US seeks to retain global primacy, but its strategic weaknesses are evident in 3 events: (i) Iran’s ability to retain its state structure and leadership; leverage oil and the Straits of Hormuz despite US-Israeli aggression and attempts for de-stabilization. Resistance groups in Palestine, Lebanon, Yemen remain. (ii) US inability to sustain funding and arms support to the Russia-Ukraine war (iii) China’s rise as ‘near peer’. The Trump-Xi meeting (May 15-16, 2026) established the two as equal powers- something the US has not experienced for decades since unipolar hegemony. Trump calls this ‘G2’, Rubio acknowledges this as “strategic stability point”. Chinese see this as a period of ‘strategic stalemate’. So, the Indo-Pacific (Asia Pacific) will remain a theatre of intense but ‘managed’ competition. This is a paradigm shift in international politics. The US seeks domination as usual while China seeks parity. This competition has global impacts.
Continue reading “NATO and the Current Conjuncture”

América Latina: No a la Guerra, No a la OTAN

Pablo Ruiz E.*
Spanish | English. Please see the English translation below.

Desde América del Sur observamos con mucha preocupación la política, maniobras y ejercicios militares que realizan los países miembros de la OTAN en el mundo y que pueden desencadenar una tercera guerra mundial que tendría consecuencias devastadora para todos los países, incluida América Latina, ya que una tercera guerra mundial contra Rusia o China, eventualmente, podría involucrar armas nucleares.

De acuerdo al Centro Estratégico Latinoamericano de Geopolítica (CELAG):

  • Colombia: Es socio global de la OTAN desde 2018, lo que implica una cooperación estrecha en seguridad, aunque no es miembro pleno.
  • Perú: Designado en 2026 como aliado principal no miembro de la OTAN por EEUU, facilitando cooperación en defensa y tecnología. Además, cuenta con certificación Nivel 2 en catalogación OTAN.
  • Argentina: Mantiene el estatus de aliado importante extra-OTAN desde 1998, fortaleciendo sus lazos.
  • Chile: Vinculado desde 2004 al Sistema OTAN de Catalogación (SOC), avanzando en modernización logística con software de la alianza.
  • Brasil: Usuario del sistema de catalogación de la OTAN y reconocido aliado importante de la OTAN.
Continue reading “América Latina: No a la Guerra, No a la OTAN”

Welfare not Warfare: Europe-wide mobilisation on 14 June against EU and NATO rearmament plans

More than 800 civil-society organisations, trade unions and movements call for demonstrations in Brussels and across the continent — just days before EU heads of state negotiate the bloc’s next long-term budget.

BRUSSELS, 9 June 2026 On Sunday 14 June, Stop ReArm Europe, a Europe-wide coalition of more than 800 civil-society organisations, trade unions and social movements, in collaboration with the Belgian platform Stop Militarisation, will take to the streets of Brussels and dozens of other cities across Europe to oppose the European Union’s and NATO’s drive to rearm. Their main demand: public money must be spent on welfare, not warfare.

The mobilisation comes just days before EU leaders meet on 18–19 June for a European Council that will negotiate the Union’s next seven-year budget — the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028–2034 — which the coalition warns is being reshaped to channel tens of billions of euros to the arms industry.

In Brussels, demonstrators will gather at 3pm at Brussels-North station under the banner Welfare not Warfare, before marching towards the institutions driving the rearmament agenda. They will reconvene from 6pm in an open assembly at the Royal Library of Belgium (Keizerslaan 4/Boulevard de l’Empereur 4, Brussels) near Central-Station to plan the next steps of a continent-wide campaign.

Organisers emphasise that 14 June is not an endpoint, but a common focal point, with demonstrations, public meetings and coordinated actions planned throughout the month in Belgium, the Netherlands, Austria, Spain, Finland, Germany, Italy and other countries.

A budget reshaped for war

The coalition opposes the EU’s ReArm Europe plan, announced in March 2025, which set out to mobilise €800 billion for arms — money drawn away from healthcare, education, climate action and social protection.The coalition rejects the idea that Europe’s security can be bought through a massive rearmament project that starves social budgets and escalates confrontation. The security concerns repeatedly highlighted by the EU, cannot in any case be resolved by rearmament.

The Commission’s proposed next budget goes further still: it would allocate around €131 billion to the defence, security and space window of the new European Competitiveness Fund — five times the amount designated in the current budget. The jump to €131 billion is a net increase of at least €100 billion over seven years on the current defence and space envelope. That sum could instead fund the salaries of around 300,000 nurses, or build roughly half a million social homes — a quarter of the 2.25 million-unit housing shortfall the European Investment Bank identified for 2025 alone.

The reach extends beyond that headline figure: civilian programmes for research, mobility and cohesion would also be opened to military use. With the overall EU budget barely growing, the coalition warns, this amounts to a direct transfer from civilian to military spending. Campaigners warn that Europe is embarking on a permanent war economy that deepens conflicts rather than resolving them, will further fuel a global arms race, and increasingly embed militarisation into everyday life — from renewed conscription and expanded reserves to surveillance and the shrinking of democratic space.

They also point to the growing influence of the arms lobby: by the coalition’s count, the European Commission met arms-industry representatives 89 times on rearmament in 2025 (to October), against only 15 meetings with NGOs, trade unions or scientists on the same topics.

Borrowing for arms is also a poor economic decision. Military spending is capital- and import-heavy, so it creates fewer jobs per euro than almost any civilian alternative: studies of military versus civilian spending consistently find that money invested in care, education or housing generates 30–50% more jobs than the same sum spent on weapons. And borrowing to buy arms locks future generations into debt with no productive asset to show for it.

What the coalition is demanding

Stop ReArm Europe is calling on EU and national decision-makers to:

  • invest in healthcare, education, decent work, housing and a just climate transition — not in the militarisation of society;
  • uphold international law and the UN Charter, and defend human and labour rights;
  • prioritise dialogue and diplomacy over confrontation;
  • invest in international solidarity and cooperation as the surest foundation for stable, secure societies; and
  • pursue arms control and nuclear disarmament in order to guarantee peace and human security.

Furthermore, the coalition is urging MEPs to refuse consent to any long-term EU budget that channels €131 billion into defence, security and space while squeezing social and cohesion funding.

“Rearmament is sold to us as security, but the only thing it really secures are the profits of the weapon industries. A society with crumbling hospitals and a destabilised climate is not secure. Spending billions on arms while squeezing care, education and cohesion makes Europe poorer and more dangerous, not safer. On 14 June we are demanding a different set of priorities.” – Katerina Anastasiou, spokesperson for Stop ReArm Europe

The coalition is inviting movements, organisations and elected representatives at European and national level to join the Brussels demonstration and organise actions in their own communities. Local initiatives can be registered on the Stop ReArm Europe campaign’s action calendar, as part of a growing popular mobilisation demanding welfare, not warfare.


Notes to editors

  • Stop ReArm Europe is a pan-European coalition of more than 800 civil-society organisations and movements, spanning peace, climate, debt, trade-union, development, health and human-rights sectors, campaigning to redirect resources “from war to peace” and towards human and common security.
  • Brussels demonstration: Sunday 14 June, 15:00, departing Brussels-North station.
  • Across Europe: decentralised demonstrations and actions are planned through June. A full calendar is available at https://calendar.stoprearm.org/events/
  • The Belgian national mobilisation is organised by the Stop Militarisation Platform under the banner “For social justice, against war” (Pour la justice sociale, contre la guerre), backed by some 40 Belgian organisations including the FGTB/ABVV and CSC/ACV trade unions, CNCD-11.11.11, Greenpeace, DiEM25, Oxfam, Pax Christi, Vrede vzw, CNAPD and Vredesactie.
  • The European Council of 18–19 June will discuss the next Multiannual Financial Framework on the basis of a “negotiation box” prepared by the Cypriot presidency. The Commission’s proposal allocates €131 billion to the defence and space window of the European Competitiveness Fund, a fivefold increase on the 2021–2027 figure of roughly €26 billion.

Media contact

International Peace Bureau (IPB)
Email: info@ipb.org
Web: www.ipb.org

Issued by Stop ReArm Europe Coordination on behalf of its member organisations.

IPB Situational Brief: The Sudanese Civil War

The Victims, The Perpetrators & The Lifelines

June 2026 | International Peace Bureau

This situational brief examines the ongoing civil war in Sudan, tracing the origins of the conflict, the regional and international actors sustaining it, and its devastating impact on civilians. It highlights the widespread atrocities committed during the war, the catastrophic humanitarian crisis facing the Sudanese population, and the vital role played by Sudan’s Emergency Response Rooms (ERRs) in sustaining communities amid state collapse. The brief also outlines the failures of the international response and presents the International Peace Bureau’s position and calls to action for governments, institutions, and civil society.

IPB POSITION & CALL TO ACTION

The International Peace Bureau (IPB) recognizes the Sudan Emergency Response Rooms as among the most extraordinary examples of civilian-led humanitarian action in recent history. In a context of state collapse, genocidal violence, and international neglect, ERR volunteers have sustained millions of lives at extraordinary personal risk.

Continue reading “IPB Situational Brief: The Sudanese Civil War”

The Child Peacebuilder Guide : 10 Pillars for Practicing Peace

Developed by Re-Imagining New Communities. Inspired by children
participating in Children-Led Community Peace Labs ( CLCP-Labs) by
Sahlim Charles

Think about it. Whenever you type the term “Peace Processes” into a
search engine, what appears are images of high-level negotiations in
conference halls, policy forums, diplomatic roundtables and often
military presence in fragile contexts. This is not accidental; these
images reflect how peace is commonly framed and understood in
global discourse. Peace is often portrayed as elite, institutional and
distant from everyday life.

Yet in the everyday life of a schoolyard, a church/ temple/ shrine/
mosque, or a neighborhood, children are already practicing peace in
ways that are immediate, relational and deeply transformative. When a
child says “I will help you,” “I am sorry,” or “Come, let’s do this together,”
they are not merely behaving well, they are exercising leadership. Theseacts by children remind the global community that peace is not
abstract. It is built in daily interactions, small choices, and shared
responsibility.

Continue reading “The Child Peacebuilder Guide : 10 Pillars for Practicing Peace”

Peace Wave 2026

The Fifth Annual 24-Hour Peace Wave remains a 24-hour-long Zoom featuring peace actions in the streets and squares of the world, moving around the globe with the sun. But participants will have until November 1, 2026, to submit videos of peace activism, filmed at any time in the first 10 months of 2026.

We will then compile the videos into 24 videos of 40 minutes each. We will then announce the date of a Zoom webinar that will have 40 minutes of video and 20 of introduction and live discussion (including your questions) every hour for 24 hours.

Organized by: International Peace Bureau, World BEYOND War, and Stop the War Coalition Philippines.

New Zealand: Military spending prioritised in Budget 2026

By: Peace Movement Aotearoa

Military spending is prioritised again in this year’s Budget as New Zealand continues to pursue a range of militaristic fantasies as it seeks to be a combat capable “force multiplier” with “enhanced lethality and deterrent effect”.

Amidst cuts to public services to eliminate “wasteful spending”, the rapidly escalating climate emergency and the desperate need for more funding for failing social services, military spending allocated this year increased to $5,882,661,000 [1] – an increase of more than 9.3% over actual military spending in the past financial year, which averages out to more than $113.1 million every week. This once more illustrates a government stuck in the same old thinking about ‘security’, choosing to focus on an outdated narrow concept of military security rather than real security that gives all New Zealanders the chance to flourish.

Continue reading “New Zealand: Military spending prioritised in Budget 2026”

Welfare not Warfare | Rally In Brussels on 14 June & Month Of Decentralized Action Across Europe!

Organized and coordinated by the Stop Militarization Platform and StopRearmEurope campaign, of which IPB is a member.
If you haven’t already, sign our call to action here and join the European movement against ReArm Europe!

Continue reading “Welfare not Warfare | Rally In Brussels on 14 June & Month Of Decentralized Action Across Europe!”